In one recent commentary column in The NY Times, one respectful and one of the many famous economic professors, Paul Krugman, said he believed China has played a role in bringing harms to other nations in the midst of recent economic recession.
China has been keeping its currency pegged to the dollar — which means that a country with a huge trade surplus and a rapidly recovering economy, a country whose currency should be rising in value, is in effect engineering a large devaluation instead…And that’s a particularly bad thing to do at a time when the world economy remains deeply depressed due to inadequate overall demand. By pursuing a weak-currency policy, China is siphoning some of that inadequate demand away from other nations, which is hurting growth almost everywhere. The biggest victims, by the way, are probably workers in other poor countries. In normal times, I’d be among the first to reject claims that China is stealing other peoples’ jobs, but right now it’s the simple truth.
That would probably mean China’s such behavior has brought harms to those countries which have always been the biggest markets (the U.S. in particular) for products produced in poor countries and thus indirectly affects those poor countries and leave many of their citizens out of work. Though the world economy is reported to have returned back to normal track, is it still right to suppose that much more aid to beg for (for those poorer countries) in such a situation. When those richer nations are also struggling to deal with all the troubles brought in by the 2008’s crisis, does it mean the often-claimed more generous China’s aid is becoming more appealing? At least it has already become the most generous assistance to Cambodia (at least the government thinks so).